New DIII-D eqdsk files are provided by Rich Groebner
Four equilibria that represent plasma current scan has been provided by Rich Groebner. The readme file that came with the eqdsk files describes these discharges as follows
Jan 22, 2010
This directory contains DIII-D eqdsks from and experiment performed
March 4, 2008. This experiment had discharges which covered a range of
plasma currents, toroidal fields and plasma triangularities. The following
discharges were part of a four point current scan (0.5-1.5 MA) at a constant
toroidal magnetic field (2.1T) and at a constant shape (average triangularity
0.55). These discharges were run at an approximately constant normalized
toroidal beta (beta_n ~ 2.1-2.4). The pedestal temperature and density were
not constant in the scan.
The list of shots and currents for the eqdsks in this directory. These are
the eqdsks that were used for the ONETWO analysis as part of the profiles.py
analysis, used to generate beam pressure profiles in the analysis. The
g-eqdsks are from: /u/groebner/analysis/exps/2008/theory_test/python4.
The a-eqdsks were obtained from mdsplus with the writea.pro IDL procedure.
These eqdsks were earh run at the time of a specific Thomson laser pulse.
The fitting model used for the eqdsks allows for a finite edge current,
but the current density and pressure profiles should not be taken as anywhere
close to the experimental values. These eqdsks were used for purposes of
mapping experimental data on magnetic flux coordinates.
shot # Ip (MA) EFIT runid EFIT time
132016 1.50 EFIT04 3023
132014 1.17 EFIT04 3023
132017 0.85 EFIT04 2998
132018 0.51 EFIT04 1948
Results from this experiment have been discussed in"
Snyder et al., Phys of Plasmas 16 (2008) 056118
Groebner et al., NF 49 (2009) 085037
The discharges are analyzed with the TEQ equilibrium solver in the Caltrans code. Results of the analysis are to be published on the DIII-D analysis webpage. The TEQ code shows relatively high residuals for the GS solution in the near separatrix region. These discrepancies between the EFIT and TEQ solutions need to be addressed in future.
Leave a Reply