XGC-A08/A09: testing changes in the code that related to problems with particle density evolution

Two input files are generated based on XGC-A07 input file: (1) XGC-A08: same equilibrium and same input file, but older version of the code; (2) XGC-A09: same equilibrium, newer version of the code, but older version of the flow shear suppression model. Left panels show results for the case XGC-A08 and right panels show results for the caseXGC-A09

Results clearly indicated that the problem  has been introduced during the recent merge with the svn repository.


XGC-A07: new equilibrium and updated version of the code

The FMCFM changes has been synchronized with the version of the XGC-0 code from the svn repository. Gunyoung committed his changes related to the impurity radial model and get_mid_r bug. Theory motivated coefficient for the flow shear suppression factor is used. The simulation uses high resolution equilibrium provided by Rich Groebner. There are significant changes in the plasma density dynamics. It is not clear if these changes relate to (1) model for flow shear suppression factor; (2) new equilibrium; (3) other changes to the code. In order to isolate the problem, two new simulations are submitted: (1) XGC-A08: same equilibrium and same input file, but older version of the code; (2) XGC-A09: same equilibrium, newer version of the code, but older version of the flow shear suppression model.


XGC-A04: Increased particle transport in the SOL region

The particle diffusivity in the outside separatrix region has been increased from 0.05 to 0.5 m^2/sec:

tbl_D_coeff2=0.5D0     ! m^2/sec, D_turb for outside of separatrix (SOL+private flux region)

The resulting plasma density profile is identical to the profile obtained in the case XGC-A03.

This problem is likely related to a mistake in the particle diffusivity implementation in the SOL region.


New update with respect to experimental data from DIII-D

Rich Groebner has provided information about total heating powers in the DIII-D discharges that are considered from modeling with the XGC-0 code. According to Rich:

Neutral beam injection was the only auxiliary heating on these discharges... I have supplied powers averaged over the entire time of interest. 
 
132014   8.12 MW 
132016   7.35 MW 
132017   8.49 MW 
132018   7.09 MW

Rich has also provided the plasma density and temperature profiles.


XGC-221: series of single particle simulations

Several single particle simulation has been run with different time step. The energy is preserved within 2% in the simulation for 200 ion transient times only when the time step is about 1e-3 of ion transient time (sml_dt=1.d-3). Figures below show energy as function of time

sml_dt=0.02

sml_dt=0.005

sml_dt=0.002

sml_dt=0.001

In these single particle simulations, the computation time with the FMCFM interface (fm_use=1)

real    20m15.682s
user    19m57.207s
sys     0m6.028s

is compared with the corresponding simulation without the FMCFM interface (fm_use=0)

real    2m0.557s
user    1m55.979s
sys     0m3.632s


Case XGC-223: test for new radiation and new sheath potential models

Updated version of the XGC-0 code that includes recent additions from Gunyoung Park is used for this simulation. The new version of XGC- inludes:

  1. New simple radiation model is based on ADPAK radiation data. The model assumes constant impurity density in the region where radiation cooling is applied;
  2. Improved sheath potential model;
  3. Diffusivities in the SOL region is set by tbl_ parameters rather than FMCFM models.

The electron temperature is slightly lower in the SOL region comparing to the electron temperature in the case XGC-222.